Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deineath

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Coredesat 05:42, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Deineath

Deineath (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Contested PROD. Non notable wirter/prober. Fails WP:BIO. No assertion of notability Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 15:22, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

• Delete per WP:BIO. Justin ^chat 17:16, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, per above. Cirt (talk) 17:23, 13 December 2007 (UTC).
• Weak keep. What the hell is a "prober"? Appears notable, but needs a lot of work, so I've tagged it. Bearian (talk) 18:14, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Do we have a guideline on what makes some probers notable and others not notable? I'm sure there's a well-thought essay out there somewhere. Let's see if this turns out blue or red....WP:PROBER. Keeper | 76 20:45, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete No awards, nothing to make him seem more notable than any other music writer with a startup. --NickPenguin_(contribs) 04:02, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.