Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Defend Your Castle

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Kilo-Lima|^(talk) 18:23, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Defend Your Castle

Fails to assert the game's notability. Possible speedy deletion candidate. Same goes for Defend your castle, which was created just now with a copyvio cut and paste, then redirected to Defend Your Castle. NTK 07:48, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

• Comment: I love this game so I have to recuse myself from this vote. Alexa rating of 13,283. Half a million google hits. It also has some associated forums and a pay version. savidan^{(talk) (e@)} 08:42, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
  • But does it have an article constructed from verifiable information taken from reliable, third-party sources, or the potential for such an article to be constructed? -- Saberwyn 10:46, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
  • I don't think you need to recuse yourself just because you love the game, given you are a WP editor with a history, as long as you think you can make a proper judgment. But as I write below, the Alexa rank is not for the game, it's for the entire game studio's website. NTK 16:39, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
• Weak delete per nominator. JIP | Talk 11:05, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
• Weak keep notable flash game and sadly, we do have a lot of articles without third-party sources. Kotepho 14:12, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, I share Saberwyn's concern, but I do believe the potential exists. That Alexa rank number is very good for a flash game, so this is definitely notable; let it remain with a {{cleanup-sources}} tag, and see if it can be improved. Mangojuice 14:26, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
  • The Alexa rank is not for this flash game, but rather for xgenstudios.com's entire website. That rank, incidentally, is 13,283, which is not particularly good for a game studio. Certainly it does not make the game "definitely notable." NTK 16:39, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete The game site is possibly notable (compare Addicting Games) but the individual game isn't notable enough to justify a separate article. --ES2 18:43, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. It is a very popular game. I have played it before, and it is a notable game, though may not be of much use for serrious gaming. Freddie 01:50, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep with improvements. I came to the defend your castle article looking for more strategies and only found information that is easily found in the game instructions already. I would also like to know more information about when it started, inventor, internet pop culture status, etc.. Cha 1:56, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep.this is a great game and the page is extremly helpful I need this page.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.