Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Defence companies of Serbia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete once articles have been categorized. Mackensen (talk) 14:20, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Defence companies of Serbia

Defence companies of Serbia (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Totally unreferenced and non notable.Harlowraman 19:08, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

• Comment. If this is kept, it should probably be moved to List of Serbian defence contractors. It could be argued that this article and Category:Defence companies of Serbia (couldn't link the cat for some reason) are redundant to one another; FWIW, there are only two articles linked from the list and only two articles in the cat. One of the usual arguments for keeping list articles that could be considered redundant to existing cats is that lists can contain redlinks, as this one does (or would, if the names of companies that don't have articles were links). So, the argument would be for deleting the category and keeping this--except that the article has no sources. Could some possibly be added? Heather 20:01, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Strongly resembles [1]. Several of the entries do not appear to be defense companies. --Alksub 21:50, 1 September 2007 (UTC) Lacks references and context. --Alksub 21:52, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete make a category for the notable ones, otherwise this is a directory information Corpx 05:28, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 02:48, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 02:52, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.