Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deez Nutz

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. --Ryan Delaney talk 06:24, 10 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Deez Nutz

Not notable. brenneman(t)(c) 02:58, 4 September 2005 (UTC)

  • Delete per brenneman. Nandesuka 03:10, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete as with Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Deez nuts (but not a recreation). Gazpacho 04:45, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. This is now apparently the third creation of this with different spellings. Zoe 05:14, September 4, 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete deez, doze, and any future nutz, nuts, nuttz and nutsolas. Alf melmac 13:34, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Deleete. As per Alf. / Peter Isotalo 22:40, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Deezletz. Someone had to say it! -Splash 22:52, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
  • STRONG KEEP. DEEZ NUTS ARE RELEVANT. Seriously, though, "deez nuts" as a punchline is roughly as common as "your mom" as a punchline. -HX 02:00, 5 September 2005 (UTC).
    • I think we need a serious, centralized discussion about the merit of keeping all these pure slang articles. We're not only obviously violating Wikipedia is not a dictionary, but rather knowingly mocking it by keeping stuff like your mom. / Peter Isotalo 08:29, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete Oh how I hate black english vernacular. Klonimus 09:22, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
    • Perhaps you could rephrase? - brenneman(t)(c) 11:20, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
    • Wow, you're a tool. -HX 14:43, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
  • 'COMMENT': I just rewrote the entire thing to make it a little more acceptable, and listed some sufficiently notable uses (if it's on The Chronic, it's notable, IMHO) -HX 16:48, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Weak delete, doesn't seem that much encyclopedic. — JIP | Talk 08:56, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.