Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deeping Stream

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - no consensus - SimonP 14:33, Mar 31, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Deeping Stream

Is Google a fair barometer for Tolkien-related articles? Should this be kept, merged, or deleted? Does a LOTRwiki exist for this and similar articles? See also: Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Deeping Coomb. --GRider\^talk 00:46, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Please read Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/GRider.

• Don't abuse VFD to make a point. Create something like Wikipedia:WikiProject Middle-earth as a child of Wikipedia:WikiProject Fictional Series if you wish to help remove the number of Middle-earth articles here in a productive way. Jordi·✆ 00:48, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• This should be merged or kept. Kappa 02:02, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• WP:POINT. See also: Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Google test. —Korath (Talk) 02:03, Mar 19, 2005 (UTC)
• This nomination is not correctly formed. Please read the instructions. Chris 02:38, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, nn fancruft. ComCat 02:49, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Middle-Earth-cruft, and not a likely search term. --Carnildo 04:04, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Agree with Anárion and Korath about WP:POINT. Eric119 05:01, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • On second thought, merging would be okay as well. Eric119 05:22, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete minor fictional trivia CDC (talk) 05:21, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Merge as minor concept. Be bold and do so - it's more fun than listing it here! Radiant_* 09:56, Mar 19, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep Harmless. Wincoote 11:26, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Merge. I do not believe there is sufficient information in Tolkein's work to expand this from a stub article, and hence there is insufficient detail to stand on its own. This is a stream that gets a brief mention in relation to a battle that has an article that states that Tolkein himself stated was incidental to the main story.Average Earthman 12:07, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Ignore nomination as made made bad faith, otherwise keep or merge - SimonP 15:30, Mar 19, 2005 (UTC)
• Ignore apparent bad faith nomination, else keep or merge - David Gerard 17:27, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, useless. Grue 20:07, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, and expand. Megan1967 02:29, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • Expand how? The article already contains the sum total of all information on the subject. --Carnildo 07:25, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Merge' to either Rohan, Helm's Deep, or something similar. Very trivial on it's own. -R. fiend 04:36, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.