Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deep brain stimulation

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep per WP:SNOW and clear consensus and apparently the copyright issue has been resolved. Non-admin closure.--JForget 01:20, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Deep brain stimulation

Deep brain stimulation (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Article contains significant text from the journal Nature, http://www.nature.com/npp/journal/vaop/ncurrent/abs/1301408a.html;jsessionid=0016FB4E9E6717DAC69AFF2B4D72EC5F Alterego 06:53, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

  • Keep. I believe I've rewritten the infringing section; the article as a whole doesn't appear to be affected. Zetawoof(ζ) 07:39, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep. Sections of a page that may be copyright violations is not a reason to bring a page to AFD. It's better to clean up the page, and rewrite/remove the offending sections. Recurring dreams 09:05, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep Perfectly legitimate article and Zetawolf has taken the action the nominator might have done instead of bringing this to AfD. Nick mallory 11:54, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy keep, goodness. Thanks for fixing the copyvio, Zetawoof; I'm embarrassed that I didn't check for one sooner,[1] since I've watched the article on and off for a long time. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 12:57, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Snowball keep per Zetawoof's rewrite. Perfectly valid article. Ten Pound Hammer • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps•Review?) 13:42, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep The objection to possible copyright vio has been removed by Zetawoof's rewrite. Mandsford 13:45, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
  • keep please the rewrite is very nice the article is legitimate now yuckfoo 17:22, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
  • keep I didn't have time to find the exact edit in question and was told in IRC to list the article on AfD. thank you for cleaning it up. It was only through chance that I found it. I read the nature abstract and wanted to learn more about deep brain stimulation. I was reading the article and lo and behold, didn't this seem familiar! I would like to see that edit removed from the database completely. How do we do that? --Alterego 17:36, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy keep. If I am reading things correctly, the nomination has been withdrawn and no one has made any argument to delete this article. RFerreira 19:06, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.