Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dee Margo
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 04:05, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Dee Margo
A7, Unremarkable person/vanity page - Subject is little more than a political candidate. Somnabot 05:27, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - not notable. This is not a CSD A7 because it asserts notability. MER-C 08:42, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
- Subject just as notable as several other persons with Wikipedia articles, inluding Robert Arter and John W. Creighton, Jr., if for nothing else than their terms as appointed aides to the Secretary of the Army. Stampedem 09:54, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
i agree that this is set up as a vanity page and should be completely rewritten without such bias; however, i am not convinced that he doesn't "deserve" a wikipedia entry given his appointments and political clout.Desert boy 15:46, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
- I dislike pages created because someone is a candidate, because (until they win) they're usually of minor interest and frequently they become targets of people with an agenda. I think it's best for the project to delete such pages in general, and this one in particular. Friday (talk) 16:00, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete When a candidate for political office achieves that office, they have a good likelihood of being sufficiently notable to warrant an article. Until that time... nn. Marcus22 17:09, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
- Comment Dances around the question of whether or not he's the Republican nominee, doesn't it? JCScaliger 19:22, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as per above. wikipediatrix 14:01, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.