The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete as fork of the history of deconstruction. If you want to see this "article" just pick it out of the history. No need to split the old version into its own article. Kimchi.sg 09:34, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
Incorrect use of the article space. This article was created after a complete rewrite of the Deconstruction article. The problem is that that's what the history is for. :) This should be userfied or deleted. Just no reason or purpose for it. Woohookitty(meow) 09:27, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.