The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was speedy delete as it was originally marked. I mistook the style of the entry for an actual dicdef. theProject 21:57, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
Bushism? Amusing, but seems like a nonsense page to me. Neologism at best. (One of the most notable examples of non-standard grammatical construction is called a "Bushism") --NMChico24 21:45, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.