Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deborah C. Blue

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 02:10, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Deborah C. Blue

Deborah C. Blue (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non-notable, middle-ranking university administrator and professor, unsourced. Nearly-identical article ‎Debbie Blue was speedied A7. Clicketyclack 00:20, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletions. -- -- Myke Cuthbert (talk) 01:20, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, no sources provided, and I'm not convinced of her notability. Lankiveil 02:17, 26 May 2007 (UTC).
• Delete per nom. No web hits, and no sources given.---=Elfin=-³⁴¹ 02:19, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete I don't think she meets the notability threshold, no sources cited. Possible self-promotion issues, too, check out Special:Contributions/Okbu, Special:Contributions/Tiddled, and Mark Brister, another administrator at OBU. --Akhilleus (talk) 02:40, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete: it may be continuing the systematic bias from academia into Wikipedia, but generally, professors of teaching aren't notable because they don't generate verifiable sources such as publications which create notability beyond their local community. We're even harder on college administrators, so her position in that role is even less likely to be notable. Possible copyright violations from [1], and shows errors in the article -- joined faculty in 1980, not named professor at that date. etc. -- Myke Cuthbert (talk) 02:47, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
• Very weak keep, the bio on the OBU website gives sufficient notability, and that bio should be considered reliable unless shown otherwise. John Vandenberg 03:31, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete unless references as indicated above are added to verify notability. JJL 21:17, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Non-notable --† Ðysepsion † ^{Speak your mind} 22:46, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete she is not notable as an academic--a professor of mathematics without a research doctorate. Is she notable as an academic administrator? She is Dean & Senior VP of the college at a extremely small college (enrollment 345). Since the class ratio is 15:1, that=23 faculty in all--the university page lists 10 administrators. The Senior VP for academic affairs (usually=provost) at a major university would almost always be notable--usually be a very important academic with a distinguished record. Not DCB. Personally, I';d be willing to count the president of any college as notable, but I doubt many would agree. DGG 02:05, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per commenters above, no non-trivial sources to speak of, the article is failing WP:BLP at present. Yamaguchi先生 07:19, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per commenters above. Stellatomailing 17:29, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.