Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Debbie Schlussel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Daniel.Bryant 10:05, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Debbie Schlussel

Not noteworthy Pozole 15:39, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

• Keep. Ms. Schlussel is quite a well-known pundit, I know her from her many appearances on the Bill Maher and Howard Stern shows. - Mcasey666 16:37, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. She is famous, unfortunately. ... discospinster _talk 18:49, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep — 478,000 hits on google, and the article is actually pretty par. JoeSmack ^Talk(p-review!) 21:18, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep — JonMoseleyI think it is a significant weakness in this process that we are not advised of the basis or category under which deletion is being considered, in order to better evaluate and respond. However, I think that throughout Wikipedia discussion of events and organizations and activiteis of interest is frequently greatly enhanced by knowing something about the actors involved. It is a very common, and very helpful, aspect of Wikipedia to not only know what happened but also who it was who had a hand in it. Furthermore, just as a stand alone proposition, people often want to know "WHO IS X, anyway?" if they hear a name. Indeed, explanation of persons is a common feature of a true paper encyclopedia. Therefore, I do not see how it can be appropriate to remove any information about anyone on the public scene. I see far less important and more trivial entries on Wikipedia. Unless space is an issue, in which case you should try a few SMALL VERY FEW ads to cover costs, I cannot see any justification for limiting people's knowledge of who is who and what they are doing on the national or even sub-national stage.
• Speedy Keep Yup, she's famous. --Marriedtofilm 03:43, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
• Strong keep as primary author of current rewrite, highly noteworthy. I'll note that one of the reasons this article exists is because Jimbo requested a rewrite [1].
• Speedy Keep - no question this should stay, suprised its even under debate 4.18GB 01:25, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.