Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Debbie Kasper

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Sr13 09:13, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Debbie Kasper

Debbie Kasper (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Sounds like someone who opens for other acts at present--likely not notable. Blueboy96 01:51, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

  • Speedy delete, nn-bio. Makes no assertion of notability. fethers 02:15, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
    • Not a speedy deletion candidate because it does assert notability (Emmy award nominations, writing for the sitcom Rosanne, for example). Sancho 02:56, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep. Notability is definitely asserted. I found a reference, and the other material can be referenced... I don't have the time at the moment though. Sancho 02:56, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment. This may be a conflict of interest creation though... the creator was Kasperdeb3535 (talk · contribs) Sancho 02:58, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak keep - Some references given, some notability argued. Probably not the most notable person out there but is a mjor part of an active play that according to this link has lots of independent mainstream press coverage. DreamGuy 09:08, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak Keep, the awards she's won don't suggest she's the cream of the crop, but she at least has them. Lankiveil 10:46, 13 May 2007 (UTC).
  • Keep. More notable than one might guess from reading the initial content of the stub. — Athaenara ✉ 13:47, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep per award nom and media coverage. --Infrangible 02:23, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep per the above. Nowhere near a speedy deletion candidate, please try again. Burntsauce 17:45, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep due to awards, work for the Roseanne show and some (although) little references.JForget 20:01, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.