Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deathrock fashion

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete as no reliable sources were ever found confirming this topic. Lots of google hits and a LJ community do not meet the threshold here. If anyone does find suitable sources, I will consider undeleting so you can work on the article. W.marsh 14:50, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Deathrock fashion

Deathrock fashion (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

No sources. I could be wrong, but my guess is that the reliable sources just aren't out there and there's no way to create a verifiable article about this. P4k (talk) 00:39, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

• Neutral: I don't know. Lots of g-hits suggest that the term is used and well known. Article itself needs sourcing. Is this OR? - Rjd0060 (talk) 01:29, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

• • Yes.P4k (talk) 20:27, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

• Keep I think they are. Its a valid article, fairly well written. Keep. The term is all over the web. scope_creep (talk) 20:09, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

• Keep What Scope creep said, this style is popular albeit and has many places all over the web if you just search it up. However, it would be NICE if someone could get some sources for it... --212.140.139.225 (talk) 11:27, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
• The fact that there are a lot of google hits (many of which are mirrors of Wikipedia anyway) doesn't mean that reliable sources exist.P4k (talk) 01:00, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.