Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Death Knight (Warcraft III)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was redirect. —Xezbeth 06:42, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Death Knight (Warcraft III)

Duplicate of death knight Talrias (t | e | c) 15:29, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)

  • just redirect; death knight is of superior quality. Dunc|☺ 16:43, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Redirect to death knight. You shouldn't even need to vfd it if it's that obvious. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 17:55, Jun 6, 2005 (UTC)
  • Comment: Why should it be redirected? It should be deleted instead. Talrias (t | e | c) 18:01, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
    • Comment - redirects are cheap. Somebody went to that article name for this. -- Jonel 22:41, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
      • Comment - the person who created it went by the naming scheme "unit name (Warcraft III)" for other articles too (including spells in the game). Talrias (t | e | c) 00:32, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Merge content into Undead Scourge and delete. The link on the Undead Scourge could then be redirected to death knight. — RJH 20:47, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete the page. I have already copied all of the material off into Warcraft III strategy. I apologize for creating a page that seemed to be redundant - i was planning on expanding it to focus it more on the strategic uses of the unit in Warcraft III than on a general description of the Death knight in the Warcraft universe. Admins: I am the sole contributer.RampagingCarrot 06:55, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.