Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Death Has Grey Eyes

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 11:50, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Death Has Grey Eyes

Death Has Grey Eyes (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) - (View log)

The article is about a not-notable book. It does not list the author, sources, plot or much else, and the page has the wrong title. The book is called "Olivia Is Death With Grey Eyes" but the page is "Death Has Grey Eyes" so it is a wrong page even. Regarding inbound links, it is only linked to from List of The Shadow stories where most of the other titles do not have pages so I dont know why this book deserves a separate bad of this kind Pernambuco 17:23, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete for the reasons Ive given Pernambuco 17:23, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
Please note that you don't have to vote again after nominating - AfD procedure is based on consensus and discussion, not 'counting heads'. Walton monarchist89 18:21, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
o.k. thank you, I am sort of new here, but I was aware already that votes is based on discussion and not really on the majority, and I like this, it means that the best argument wins, and not just who can find most of his friends to support. I am the nominator here Pernambuco 04:47, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom, unless sources can be found to demonstrate the book's notability (e.g. independent reviews, numbers in print). Walton monarchist89 18:21, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete: no apparent basis to assert notability at this time, either under the proposed WP:BK or WP:N. Google books and google scholar both lack any reference to this work; without someone digging up some critical commentary or contemporaneous news or reviews, it's not notable by current standards. TheronJ 19:32, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.