Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deakin Business School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep faithless (^speak) 12:15, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Deakin Business School

Deakin Business School (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Article of non-notable sub-school of a university. Fails WP:N Twenty Years 14:12, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Twenty Years 14:14, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

• Merge are redirect with the university page. Gtstricky^{Talk or C} 16:28, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
• Keep major law, medical, business and similar schools, whether called schools or colleges, are notable. In this case it apparent accounts for almost half of the postgraduate enrollment.DGG (talk) 04:24, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
• Keep per DGG - non-notability need to be substantiated - SatuSuro 07:46, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
• Keep, very notable school at the university. Per DDG, this is probably the most important and high-profile part of Deakin University. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 12:40, 5 March 2008 (UTC).
• Keep, I agree it's notable, but it is young and dynamic. In a few years time it will have quite a substantial number of distinguised individuals that have made their mark in the corporate world such as Chris Lynch of BHP-Billiton. To make the article acceptable, it should be expanded to fully reflect the institution it is. Jaker5 (talk) 11:43, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.