Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dead Skin Mask Slayer Tribute

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Johnleemk | Talk 13:53, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Dead Skin Mask Slayer Tribute

• Fixed page I have added all the proof you have asked for Jtravis 18:38, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

• Do Not Delete

Dead Skin Mask HAS:

from "notability criteria guideline for Wikipedia" (your rules)

• Has gone on an international concert tour, or a national concert tour in at least one large or medium-sized country^[1], reported in notable and verifiable sources
• Has been prominently featured in any major music media.

JtravisJtravis 17:05, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

A tribute band with no assertion of notability. Which might be a mistake, or might reflect a lack of notability... Just zis  Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] 22:43, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

• DO NOT DELETE [[Jtravis}}Jtravis 16:27, 4 February 2006 (UTC) I read you guidlines. Dead Skin Mask HAS been in a Magazine. LAW OF INERTIA. They press 75,000 copies of their mag. I have a copy if I need to mail to who is in charge here! #2. They have played Japan. #3 they have been on blabbermouth .net and knac.com. ALL can be proven! Maybe you should cite all other tribute band pages you have here, then too! I DO NOT find this a personal attack. You are not following your own rules. Here are 3 of your qualifications they meet, and you still insist on removing the page...what is wrong here?

• Delete Arbustoo 23:44, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per JzG,yk? And by the way this AfD was vandalized once here Ruby 01:22, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. This is because the band is not very notable. Unfortunately new editors tend to take these things personally - it's not an attack. We have WP:MUSIC guidelines on what bands get articles here and there's no proof that yours meets those guidelines. If you have proof that we are wrong, please add it to the article. --kingboyk 02:22, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:MUSIC and apparent sock/meatpuppetry. Stifle 01:58, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.