Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DeadSpawn

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect. W.marsh 14:17, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] DeadSpawn

Not significant enough for an entry. While this band spawned (no pun intended) several others, it doesn't really comply with inclusion guidelines. BrianFG 10:57, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete: point six of WP:BAND notwithstanding, I think that Daysend are only barely notable, this doesn't merit their inclusion. --David Mestel^(Talk) 11:22, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect — per that point 6. Redirects are cheap. --AbsolutDan ^(talk) 17:55, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

 AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 23:44, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

• Redirect to Daysend. Seems like an exact match to the point cited from WP:BAND. It would be trickier if there were multiple band members who are now in different notable bands, but as it is the redirect looks like it would cover everything notable. Mike Christie (talk) 13:16, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.