Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/De-vice

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete per SNOW. PeaceNT 13:59, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] De-vice

De-vice (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

A non-notable online magazine. The article is unsourced, makes no real assertion of notability and a quick google search comes up with little relevant. Mattinbgn/ ^talk 23:00, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- Mattinbgn/ ^talk 23:02, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nomination. Alan Liefting
• Delete - non-notable, unsourced, reads a little like ad copy. Mr.Z-mantalk¢ 23:39, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete non-notable, possible advert. Orderinchaos 01:56, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, reads like an ad. Not convinced it's a particuarly notable mag. Lankiveil 12:28, 28 May 2007 (UTC).
• Delete per WP:VSCA. hmwithtalk 16:16, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy delete Per nom and ors. Definatly WP:VSCA. Thewinchester ^(talk) 05:11, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.