Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ddn

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Joyous 00:02, Feb 5, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Ddn

Non notable organisation. Originally listed as a speedy however questionable notability is not a criteria for speedy deletion. -- Francs2000 | Talk [[]] 21:41, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. A "secretive community" established in 2004 by "three anonymous visionaries" is just another way of saying "me and my two friends". / Alarm 23:16, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Mikkalai 23:34, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Josh Cherry 00:59, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable. Megan1967 03:23, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete It's either a joke, or what Alarm describes. Ain't nothing on Google relating to this. HowardB 14:39, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.