Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Day of my Capture

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete, should not have been relisted. Radiant_>|< 07:43, August 29, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Day of my Capture

Not notable web page (alexa: rank 1,599,879). Nothing links to this page (google search), promotion. feydey 16:59, 22 August 2005 (UTC)

• Delete nn website vanity. --Etacar11 02:04, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Could someone please explain that because It's not a popular webpage, the article should be deleted? and I don't understand how I am being vain, If I had stated eg.The best show in the world, nothing is better.etc, I would consider that as vain.--Tutacanaras 08:04, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
    • Please note that Wikipedia is not a directory of website and consider reading WP:VAIN. Since nothing links to the site according to google, and Alexa seems to indicate it doesn't get much visitors, we need more evidence to show that this site is actually popular. - Mgm|^(talk) 10:30, August 23, 2005 (UTC)
      • It does not get many visitors but It's an article about the program, Not the website. This is an encyclopedia of everything, And this is a program.P.S: The website was put there to show that the show exists. You can remove the link if you wish.--Tutacanaras 08:04, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
        • Hi there. It is a common misconception that WP is "an encyclopedia of everything." This isn't true. WP is a free encyclopedia that is being written as a wiki, but it does not accept every possible contribution. You might like to look at some of the policies and guidelines that govern the acceptability of articles. If you're looking for a place that will accept articles on nearly everything, try Everything2.com.—Encephalon | ^ζ  07:03:11, 2005-08-29 (UTC)

relisting for more discussion. --Tony Sidaway^Talk 02:36, 29 August 2005 (UTC)

• • • Comment: Many newbies seem to be confused by accusations of vanity. I understand that Wikipedia uses a special, non-common definition for the term. In Wikipedia, "vanity" means that the article was created by its subject, a friend of the subject, or a member of the subject (in case of organisations) but no one else knows or cares about it. It does not necessarily mean that the article praises the subject. In fact, an article insulting its subject might still be vanity. I propose some sort of explanatory page about the term vanity. — JIP | Talk 07:29, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete No indication of notability. DES ^(talk) 03:31, 29 August 2005 (UTC)

• Delete; non-notable. Jaxl | talk 03:41, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Non-notable / vanity / advertising. Cnwb 04:43, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Its not an encyclopedia of everything. nn. -- DS1953 04:44, August 29, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. WP:N, WP:V, WP:RS, WP:NOT.—Encephalon | ^ζ  07:02:46, 2005-08-29 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.