Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dawn Under Heaven
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. W.marsh 22:09, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Dawn Under Heaven
86.128.193.98 deleted my prod tag without comment (Which, by the way, is getting very annoying). The article itself admits that there the importance or noteriety of the subject is not known yet. Perhaps we should wait until we do know? James084 21:52, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, non-notable gamecruft. At best this could be a redirect to Halo, but in my opinion it is even too obscure for that.--Isotope23 21:59, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
- Strong delete Oh please. Avi 22:04, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Cruft, shmruft. There's no bloody information here, just some speculation. (If there were any info, I'd be suggesting it be merged to Pillar of Autumn, though.) - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 22:39, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per all above. --Kinu 23:23, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as above.Blnguyen 23:54, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
- Comment: Is it just me or is it pretty useless to use ProD because they just get deleted and thus necessitate AfDs? --Agamemnon2 09:30, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
-
- I've been wondering about that too. Seems to be an initial step to AfD most of the time...--Isotope23 18:48, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
- There is a certain utility to PROD when an article is obviously going to lose on AfD but doesn't quite fit the Criteria for Speedy Deletion, which are rather strict. Ruby 14:59, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
- I've been wondering about that too. Seems to be an initial step to AfD most of the time...--Isotope23 18:48, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
- Merge with Pillar of Autumn.--KrossTalk 14:12, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per A Man In Black Ruby 14:58, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.