This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. CDC(talk) 23:48, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Sounds like a nice enuf kid, just not encyclopedic yet. Seems to be from the same folk that produced the similar valentine to Rebecca Gunter, VfDd above. Niteowlneils 19:54, 27 May 2005 (UTC)
Delete. Vanity, does not assert notability. AиDя01DTALKEMAIL 21:13, May 27, 2005 (UTC)
Delete obvious vanity--Sophitus 22:32, May 27, 2005 (UTC)
Delete Vanity page. -CunningLinguist 03:04, 28 May 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.