Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dawn's Place

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE ALL. — JIP | Talk 19:30, 24 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Dawn's Place, Figanomics, Union Jakks

This is a combined AfD for three low-traffic websites.

Dawn's Place is a porno website with an Alexa ranking of about 115000, Figanomics and Union Jakks are webforums devoted to wrestling that are ranked so low that they don't even have an Alexa rating. Pilatus 13:36, 17 November 2005 (UTC)

They clearly ought to go and are have been combined to reduce load on AfD. Pilatus 16:54, 17 November 2005 (UTC)

• Delete per Pilatus.Eusebeus 23:00, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete all per nomination. Saberwyn
• Keep on Dawn's Place and no vote on the other two websites. How exactly is it going to reduce load on AfD to have exactly the same amount of discussion, merely clustered into fewer but larger and less coherent AfD entries? -- Antaeus Feldspar 23:46, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete all as per nomination, but I agree with Antaeus Feldspar that this is not a good use of a multi-AfD, which should be reserved for cases where the subject articles are related (a good example is a band-vanity article and individual articles on its members, or a non-notable business and its principals). The implication is that all of them stand or fall on a common issue; here, there are three different issues. MCB 01:12, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete all - per nom - Tεxτurε 19:33, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete all. Websites should have major cultural or economic significance to warrant an article. McPhail 18:53, 24 November 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.