Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dawlish (Auror)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge with Minor Ministry officials in Harry Potter. Mangojuicetalk 00:38, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Dawlish (Auror)

Nonnotable, only makes a brief appearence in the Order of the Phoenix. Could be merged with a new article called Minor Aurors or Minor Ministry officials in Harry Potter which the article Williamson was merged with. Treebark (talk) 03:23, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

  • Merge per nom--Jusjih 04:45, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
    • Would you mind specifiying which article to merge to, please? --Fbv65edel / ☑t / ☛c || 12:23, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Merge with Auror and Minor members of the Order of the Phoenix and/or Minor Ministry officials in Harry Potter. --Fbv65edel / ☑t / ☛c || 12:23, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
    • Erm..where's the proof that he's a member of the Order of the Phoenix? He remained loyal to Fudge in the Order of the Phoenix. Treebark (talk) 13:53, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
      • Sorry, I was confusing Dawlish for somebody else. --Fbv65edel / ☑t / ☛c || 17:13, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Merge per Fbv65edel. ForestH2 t/c 15:20, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep per nom--Elendil's Heir 16:39, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
    • Several other Aurors have their own entries on Wiki; I'd accord him the same privilege. (NB. This is part of Elendil's Heir's comment, added in the same edit.)
      • "Keep per nom" is a meaningless vote: the nominator is arguing that it should be deleted or merged, so you cannot say that you agree with him/her that it should be kept.
      • Why not just merge them all into one article, so people who are interested in aurors can find out about all of them more easily? Then they will all get the same level of privilege, all the information about them will still be on Wikipedia, and the people who don't like them having separate articles will be satisfied. Everyone wins. Sounds good to me. — Haeleth Talk 19:40, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Merge per nom. My slight preferences is for "Minor Aurors". --David Mestel(Talk) 18:42, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

*Keep as separate article--Elendil's Heir 04:30 16 July 2006 (UTC)

    • Didn't understand the proper lingo re: "per nom." Thanks for the tip.
    • Struckthrough vote just for clarity due to earlier vote above. --David Mestel(Talk) 06:57, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Merge with Minor Ministry officials in Harry Potter. Scorpiondollprincess 13:13, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Merge with Minor Aurors, too minor for their own article, and lots of personal speculation in the stub at present. Do not keep separately. -- nae'blis (talk) 22:08, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.