Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dawgman

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez 08:51, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Dawgman

Looks like advertising/vanity. Google for "Dawgman Spencer" gives 1 hit. Other strings in the article give a few more, but all seem to be centered around the ozonemag website. I'd say not notable. --Xcali 05:55, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• Delete self promotion. JamesBurns 06:53, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Very few Google hits (and the few hits themselves are not up to much either), no AMG page, etc. Not notable. And it is undeniably self-promotion. Someone needs to read Don't Create Articles About Yourself. --Jamieli 09:00, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete for all the reasons above. Let me note that this page was created by the same user who has been rather inflammatory in the Fallen Desire Votes for Deletion discussion. Here's to him getting banned soon. Jasonglchu 14:59, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, non notable for now... Sasquatch′↔Talk↔Contributions 15:01, Jun 8, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete self-promo/vanity. --Etacar11 16:54, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. promo/vanity. Bad Dawg! No! Tobycat 03:59, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.