Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Vieira Kurz

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. In addition to notability concerns, in the current poorly referenced state there are BLP concerns. Espresso Addict (talk) 05:58, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] David_Vieira_Kurz

AfDs for this article:
Articles for deletion/David Vieira Kurz
David_Vieira_Kurz (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Not Notable Spatulacity (talk) 08:23, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

The subject is a security researcher, no doubt. However he has not invented any notable security techniques, written any notable security texts or discovered anything more than what would be expected of a typical penetration tester. Spatulacity (talk) 08:23, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

The page itself states that he is primarily known for 'aledgedly' contributing. Either he did or didn't. Even if he did it doesn't make him notable. There are no references to any of the vulnerabilties, any of the tutorials it says he wrote and the link to the VLOS page makes no mention of him. Does he even live in Berlin? There's no proof of that either, but we can probably let that slide.
TheHammockDistrict (talk) 10:04, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —Lquilter (talk) 04:46, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
  • delete I don't see hw this is supposed to pas WP:BIO or WP:PROF. Pete.Hurd (talk) 06:30, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete Allegations of wrong-doing do not add up to notability, and there is not really anything else to hang an article on. Tim Ross·talk 12:19, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete --- non-notable unreferenced security practitioner, article is the product of an WP:SPA. --- tqbf 05:52, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.