Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Szwarc

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mailer Diablo 21:56, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] David Szwarc

non-notable bureaucrat (chief administrative officer) in sub-provincial (Region of Peel, Ontario) government JChap (talk • contribs) 23:29, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete. Fails WP:BIO. -Seidenstud 00:09, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete This is the second article of a bureaucrat from the Peel region, Ontario has been nominated. I suggest Emil Kolb be also nominated for deletion as also this category Template:People with Power in Canada. Since, this category consists of middle ranking bureaucrats and are non notable. --Ageo020 00:21, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete as copyvio. Some sections are word for word copies of his official bio page http://www.region.peel.on.ca/exec-office/david-bio.htm --DarkAudit 01:29, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per above. -- Alias Flood 02:28, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete as WP:BIO failure. As much as the Kolb decision mystifies me as well, at least he was a mayor. This guy is just another low-level bureaucrat. --Kinu t/c 04:19, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment These types are the Top Level Bureaucrats since you can't get any higher in public service. Wages exceed $200,000 per year. They are responsible for managing budgets in the Billions of Dollars range. These are the people with the real Power in Canada. Politicians in Canada do not have the same level of power as they do in other democratic countries. These are important and interesting distinctions for Canada and Ontario more particularly which deserve Encyclopedic record and notoriety.WikiWoo 18:06, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete -- the CAO isn't a low- or middle-level bureaucrat, he's the top dog of the bureaucracy. If the article had any noteworthy content, I might have asked to keep it. But the editor who wrote this item has gone to great lengths to remind us that CAOs rank below CEOs, and even CEOs have to meet criteria for a Wikipedia entry. The article as it's written falls hopelessly below the bar set by WP:BIO. --Gary Will 18:58, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom.OzLawyer 19:04, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.