This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete.FCYTravis 6 July 2005 01:40 (UTC)
Delete. Clearly vanity. Absolutely no relevant google hits. Forbsey 17:00, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Delete — looks like the equivalent of a college rookie in American football. We can add him back in when he's famous. :) — RJH 18:22, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Delete vanity, little info. --Etacar11 21:23, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Delete vanity. JamesBurns 04:50, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Delete vanity. --billlund 04:51, Jun 26, 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be placed on a related article talk page, if one exists; in an undeletion request, if it does not; or below this section.