Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Scott (footballer) (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 01:34, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] David Scott (footballer)

David Scott (footballer) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Fails to meet notability guidelines for football (soccer) players. Article was previously deleted for this reason.

Delete Professor marginalia (talk) 18:15, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. —TreasuryTag talkcontribs 18:32, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete - per WP:N. WP:CSD should apply since this is the second Afd for this article. ArcAngel (talk) 21:14, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete Fails WP:BIO#Athletes as he has never played in a fully professional league. пﮟოьεԻ 57 22:48, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete fails WP:FOOTY/Notability English peasant 22:52, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
• This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related page moves. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:02, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete Fails WP:Athlete. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:05, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
• Speedy delete (G4) - article does not satisfy the notability criteria at WP:BIO or WP:ATHLETE any more than it did when it was last deleted. robwingfield ^«T•C» 08:02, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. However, this is not a valid speedy deletion G4 case, since the player's history somewhat evolved after the last AfD, even if not enough to award him a place in this encyclopedia. --Angelo (talk) 10:07, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. GiantSnowman (talk) 13:12, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.