Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David L. Taylor

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 01:03, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] David L. Taylor

David L. Taylor (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

How notable is someone whose job is to dot the 'I's and cross the 'T's, even if it is at Guantanamo Bay? This is not a political statement from me about the US record on Human rights there. I just don't get it. Delete Ohconfucius 02:44, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete super-non-notable. Missvain 03:02, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete --MECU≈talk 03:08, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. MER-C 03:22, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete "he was responsible for assuring the detainees' dossiers were properly maintained", NN --Steve (Slf67) talk 03:57, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - "Oy, you! Private, I thought I told you to slap that detainee with your left hand, not your right! Gosh, I'm gonna quit this job one of these days..." NN - ;) Spawn Man 05:50, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete non-notable military pencil-pusher. Wavy G 08:06, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete — Deputy Director of Personnel isn't a very notable post. Have we seen his name in the papers lately? If he was Deputy Director of Personnel at Guantanamo, that's another story... Non-notable. –- kungming·2 | (Talk·Contact) 08:23, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. The most non-notable article I've seen in a while. Probably vanity as well. Spinach Dip 08:59, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete I don't think this is vanity, since the editor writes a lot of articles about Guantanamo (and from his other entries may be in Alaska or the Yukon). I also think this article was created in good faith. However, I'm not convinced that this person is himself notable enough to merit inclusion in an international encyclopedia. There is nothing in the article that asserts his notability, especially since he is a living person who has not chosen to be in the public eye, and therefore his privacy concerns are of importance. --Charlene 12:14, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete While I have respect for this person's service, a biography doesn't seem to fit in WP. --Oakshade 16:15, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Google hit pulls up five pages of infomation on David L Taylor... oh wait, this isn't the attorney? The Artist? The Ball Engineer? I guess Delete
  • Delete per nom. RFerreira 06:30, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.