Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Esrati

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. TigerShark (talk) 00:11, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] David Esrati

David Esrati (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This guy is running for office, and has created the most repugnant puff piece possible, replete with links to his campaign website, his businesses and a host of other non-independent websites. Of course, he has no real links, and even if he did, this page is so awful it would have to be rewritten completely. Fibbing Bear (talk) 23:26, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

  • Delete per nom. I agree with you entirely. Wikipedia doesn't need to host the "Esrati for Congress" webpage. If he wins on March 4, then he can assert notability on being the Democratic nominee. Right now, he's a little guy with big dreams and a bigger ego. Mandsford (talk) 23:51, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom and mandsford. Calvin 1998 Talk Contribs 00:25, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete per above. This page is pretty bad. Would it qualify for WP:CSD#A7? --L. Pistachio (talk) 01:53, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Maxamegalon2000 06:19, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Move to /dev/null. Andante1980 (talk) 16:29, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete - Straight up vanity article; this is not an encyclopedia entry. Gromlakh (talk) 03:37, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom...its like someone's bio in the alumni newsletter trying to get support —Preceding unsigned comment added by Legotech (talk • contribs) 09:04, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.