Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Eden

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Glen 03:05, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] David Eden

Delete. Only two relevant Google hits, and they both come from the company's webpage. Non-notable. --דניאל ~ Danielrocks123 ^{talk contribs Count} 02:59, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. Alexa Traffic Rank for eden-electronics.com: 540,604. Also, this company just does not meet the criteria from WP:CORP. --Stubbleboy 12:13, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete if it were the "leader" it should have press mentions, but doesn't. Arbusto 03:34, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Talk to any experienced bass guitarist about bass amplifiers and it is very likely they will speak highly of David Eden amps. 'The Leader in Bass Amplification Technology' is the companies motto. You can't just magically change the motto of a company. It is their motto. CHeck it out on their website. I think this page should be kept. What harm is it doing? Kingyj 04:26, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

 AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 14:26, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

When you do a Google search for 'david eden amp' there are heaps of results resulting to David Eden bass gear, what are you talking about!? David Eden is a real respected Bass Guitar amplifier brand and I don't see any reason why this article should be deleted. Why the sudden urge to go deleting articles? Perhaps there should be more focus on improving accuracy and comprehensiveness of articles. Kingyj 09:18, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

Strong keep Nearly 700,000 Google articles. You can even buy David Eden amp Tshirts ([1]) for goodness sake! Close this Afd asap please. --Dweller 22:19, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

Keep because seems eminently notable. Rich Farmbrough, 22:43 5 October 2006 (GMT).

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.