This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. – ABCD 13:18, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Looks like vanity - no evidence that he's an actual published author. CDC(talk) 18:05, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
At a mere 18 years old, smells like vanity too. Delete and for goodness' sake someone certify patent vanity as a valid speedy case. Chris 19:53, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Delete this and DEUD, too. Vanity. RickK 00:20, Apr 1, 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.