Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Dimitri
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Sarcasticidealist (talk) 12:54, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] David Dimitri
Contested CSD, notability concerns. Keilanatalk 17:35, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
- Neutral for the moment. Potentially notable if sources are provided. Certainly not A7 territory. Tevildo (talk) 18:17, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
- Keep Plenty of references to Dimitri in reliable sources. Favour keeping as a stub and tagging it for sources. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:02, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
- Comment The article will still be eligible for deletion under WP:V until the sources are in it. They may exist, but we need to actually have them. Tevildo (talk) 01:06, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
- comment. Here you go, add them as you see fit. --Paularblaster (talk) 22:35, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
- Comment The article will still be eligible for deletion under WP:V until the sources are in it. They may exist, but we need to actually have them. Tevildo (talk) 01:06, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
- Keep - notable, per news archives. May need to be stubbified. The Evil Spartan (talk) 02:06, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 19:32, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
- Keep Plenty of good sources. They just need to be added to the article. Timmeh! 00:16, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
- Delete unless references to multiple reliable sources are added to the article. It's not enough to claim that there are "plenty of good sources" the article needs to cite at least a few of them. NBeale (talk) 08:52, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
- Keep I've found multiple reliable sources establishing notability. New York Times article, NYT review, and another NYT review should do it. Master of Puppets Call me MoP!☺ 06:57, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
