Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David All

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-03-17 09:22Z

[edit] David All

David All (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

David all (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (added by closing admin)

Only sources so far seem to be a blog, the subjects own website, a youtube link, and a facebook link. (will retract AfD if reasonable sources are added to the article)--VectorPotential^Talk 17:50, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Delete Appears to fail WP:A, WP:N, and WP:BIO comment added by by Christopher Jost (talk)

• Delete per above Alf^Photoman 18:31, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete per CSD G12 (copyvio of [1]) Mr.Z-mantalk¢Review! 18:46, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Well, I doubt it's really WP:CV, you didn't flag it for speedy, and since the author is most likely David All himself making it WP:COI at best. Can't prove it – so mostly, it's just WP:NOT#SOAPBOX -CJost
  • Okay, its not a copyvio anymore, but this revision clearly was. He still fails WP:BIO and it still reads like an ad. Mr.Z-mantalk¢Review! 21:56, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

I'll add sources.

• Strong Delete, Subtle violation of WP:SPAM, and most definatley a violation of WP:BIO. Not-notable, spam, delete. Nenyedi ^TalkContribs_@ 21:28, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete All the refs are blog entries. No evidence of notability NBeale 07:35, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.