Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Acer(2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. A Traintake the 21:18, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] David Acer

David_Acer (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) - (View log)

There is not a single reference on this page to anything specifically naming David Acer. Someones friend is not a good enough reason to rate a wiki placement. Especially from an admin.Cncndd33 00:21, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Categorizing debate: B (Biographical). ◄Zahakiel► 17:07, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
  • This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 16:30, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, no notability assertion in the article. --Dennisthe2 18:42, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
    • Changing vote to keep. One, reading on what IrishGuy points out, the nom has made few edits beyond this, and seems to know what s/he's doing - I suspect SPA or sock, ergo bad faith. Second, while I'm still concerned about secondary and tertiary sources, reading up on FISM, seems like this could make him notable. Even without point the second factored in, I feel safe with this assertion. --Dennisthe2 23:41, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Neutral Article's subject has appeared on television in at least one film. Notable and famous are not the same thing. Scienter 19:09, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep He was invited to perform at FISM which is the most prestigious competition in magic. He has valid IMDB credits. His entire resume can be seen here which lists various appearances on television, his ten appearances at Montreal's Just for Laughs festival, his writing credits, etc. This is also a bad faith nom by a brand new user who failed to notify the original author that this was even up for AfD. Please look at the contributions of these 22 sockpuppets and see if it looks familiar. IrishGuy talk 21:53, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
  • comment also, contrary to what this new user said in his edit summaryy about the previous AfD being closed in bad faith, the original can be seen here. It was, like this one, created by a sockpuppet in bad faith. That previous AfD was opened by Mongoleer who was proven by checkuser to be an abusive sock. IrishGuy talk 22:11, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep. Bad-faith nomination. RJASE1 Talk 19:34, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.