Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Datasheet

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedy keep on withdrawal of nomination. Capitalistroadster 06:07, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Datasheet

Withdrawing Nomination--Vercalos 05:37, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Largely a collection of commercial links, with very little other information. Also, a spam magnet. Vercalos 03:32, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep The major complaint was spam. I rmed the non-essential manufacturer links & slapped a cleanup tag on what remains. --Karnesky 03:45, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Article now itself is fine. Tokakeke 04:02, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - I don't see anything wrong with it (now). dbtfz^talk 04:08, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - this page has had recent spam, but apart from that it contains useful information. I compiled the main list of what's in a datasheet about 6 months ago, most people would agree it contains useful information. If in doubt, lock it to an administrator. Mjm1964 04:13, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, fine the way it is. Royboycrashfan 04:26, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, looks fine. --Terence Ong 04:53, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per above. Deckiller 05:31, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

Considering the change in the article, should I replaces the VfD with the result as keep? Or should administrators only do it?--Vercalos 05:22, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

• Comment: You can withdraw your nomination, and someone will close the afd. — Adrian Lamo ·· 05:36, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.