Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Database to ontology mapping

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was - Userify to User:Eugz/Database to ontology mapping - Peripitus (Talk) 04:38, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Database to ontology mapping

Database to ontology mapping (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

(Version nominated can be found here) Contested PROD (PROD'd version can be found here), on the rationale "give articles time to grow". Article is incomplete, and has been so for the past week. Lacks content and context to establish notability and is very difficult to understand. Appears to just be a list of various software tools, which makes it borderline advertising. --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 15:11, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

• Keep for now. Give it about a month. The person contesting the PROD did not take part in editing this article. That was an admin. --Blanchardb-^{MeMyEarsMyMouth}-timed 15:17, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

• I wouldn't be bringing this here if I did not feel that I had already given the article adequate time. I don't believe there is enough content for other editors to know what the author was attempting to do with this article. However, if any editor states that he/she plans to work on the article, I will gladly retract this nomination. --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 06:55, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. Without enough content or context to make a good judgment call about its verifiability or its.... uh... content or context, this one is really problematic. In finished form, this big project may not be suitable for wikipedia. In its current form it's definitely not. --Lockley (talk) 06:43, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - lacks context or content; incomprehensible in present form. If there's anybody out there actually working on this, I'd suggest they create the article in comprehensible form in a sandbox, then post it here. --Orange Mike | Talk 14:10, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
• Userfy to User:Eugz/Database to ontology mapping: There is a note on the talk page from the original and primary contributor that they intend to expand it. My guess is that they got sidetracked and don't know when time will be available. Given all evidence, I would suggest userfication as the most equitable solution. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 01:13, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

• I have no problem with this, so long as it is moved out of the main namespace. --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 01:20, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.