Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DarwiinRemote

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-02-10 20:29Z

[edit] DarwiinRemote

DarwiinRemote (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

I think the software is not notable enough. Prod was contested SYSS Mouse 02:49, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

• Keep - appears notable. Has 85,000-odd Ghits, and appears to be notable enough. For instance:

• http://www.macworld.com/news/2006/12/06/darwiin/index.php
• http://www.123macmini.com/news/story/570.html
• http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/06/darwiinremote-lets-wiimote-control-your-mac/
• http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/peripherals/nintendo-wiimote-hacked-into-os-x-mouse-remote-219535.php —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Haemo (talk • contribs) 03:04, 6 February 2007 (UTC).

• Keep I loaded the references above onto the article, that would seem to make it pass WP:N. Jeepday 03:54, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep Supplied sources as a whole represent notability in my book. There has been a buzz about the speed at which the Wii's controllers have been hacked for other systems, er, "wii did it!"? :P There's even mention of the activity in the latest issue of gamesmaster (though not this specific utility) - I'd like to see some development history for readers in the future, but this seems like a relevant topic. QuagmireDog 13:11, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep: I made this page because it was a notable and unique application, which it remains today. --Alegoo92 20:02, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep professional review in major publication, used as a reference. i kan reed 20:11, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep. Meets notability requirements. Philippe Beaudette 20:57, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep The links listed above by Haemo make the article, in my opinion, notable. Natl1 (Talk Page) (Contribs) 22:21, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep...ish. Wouldn't say this is too notable, but then... :P --Tunheim 22:37, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep. Not sure what the relevant guideline would be for this article, WP:SOFTWARE maybe? In any case I think it meets notability given the articles cited above. Make that 500,001 downloads, too. (jarbarf) 20:07, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.