Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darth maul's lightsaber

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 07:33, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Darth maul's lightsaber

Incredibly minor detail about Star Wars. Someone has suggested it be merged into Darth Maul, but there's nothing worthwhile to merge. EVula 22:36, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom ST47 22:43, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. There's nothing to be merged here- the Darth Maul article has a much more comprehensive bit on his weapon. --Wafulz 22:47, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Nothing worth merging.  (aeropagitica)   (talk)  22:59, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete along with Geraldo Rivera's moustache. Gazpacho 23:40, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. wikipediatrix 00:06, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, watching nervously for Indiana Jones's whip. NawlinWiki 00:08, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
• Comment. That would be awesome! Nawlin, I'll be waiting eagerly. --maru (talk) contribs 01:25, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete don't forget Morpheus' sunglasses. Danny Lilithborne 01:34, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete with nothing to merge per Wafulz. And don't forget Spock's beard... oh wait. --Kinu ^t/_c 04:57, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect to Darth Maul which already has a good description of the weapon. Sjakkalle (Check!) 07:37, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Article has bad capitalization and anyone looking for his weapon should search for Darth Maul to start with. Rename to Darth Maul's lightsaber and redirect in case something was merged which needs attribution per GFDL. - Mgm|^(talk) 09:14, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
• Comment About the merge. I found it on the page, and I finished up the nomination for the editor (who forgot to add the template to the Darth Maul article). If you check the edit history, you'll see I wasn't the one who requested it. Other than that, I have no opinion. -Royalguard11^{TalkMy Desk} 02:10, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.