Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darth Xio Jade (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 12:58, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Darth Xio Jade

A SuperShadow created, non-canon character (i.e. hoax). Not even worth merging to a list somewhere. BryanG^(talk) 02:57, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

• Delete - I find it amazing that we don't apply the same criteria to fictional characters that we do to real people. Akradecki 04:20, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Valrith 04:35, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - Darth Xio Jade apparently exists in some narrow fan-created Star Wars media, but certainly not worth notice. Google results. Delta Tango | Talk 04:46, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. MER-C 04:52, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete just because we have an article on a SW nut doesn't mean we need articles about his creations. Danny Lilithborne 06:22, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Puerile, vacuous, fancruft bollocks. Frankly, we should be deleting SuperShadow too. It's survived two AfDs [1][2]. However, neither the AfD discussions, nor the article itself, go anyway to show how the site meets WP:WEB or the person meets WP:BIO. Also, almost the entire article is original research. -- IslaySolomon 07:38, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Already deleted back in December. -LtNOWIS 23:46, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - hoax. —Khoikhoi 00:22, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.