Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darryl Parker

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. -R. fiend 17:08, 25 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Darryl Parker

• NN Tedious vanity piece The curate's egg 10:33, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
• I made it much smaller. Sorry for the details. Still learning. [Posted by 216.189.121.210 - the article's creator - who has now removed 98% of the piece]
• Delete as per The curate's egg CLW 13:03, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete nn. Note to creator of article: It's not the length per se that's the problem. It's the length of non-notable stuff, that's the problem. You have to read WP:BIO and see what wikipedia thinks is notable, and worthy of inclusion. Then, the article must show this, and provide verifiable proof (like footnotes) of it. I read the old version and new, and I don't see anything meeting the requirements. As an example, if Parker is the "author of several important historical papers", then the question is what papers, why are they important, where were they published, who published them, how widely were they read, etc... --rob 11:22, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as per rob. No problem with changing this vote if the author can add verifiably important papers. Dlyons493 13:00, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. It may qualify as a nn-bio speedy, but it's hard to tell from current content. Friday (talk) 18:16, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Molotov (talk) 21:19, 19 September 2005 (UTC)

deleted by author.

• Delete quickly, borderline speedy deletion candidate as per WP:CSD A7. Hall Monitor 19:16, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete vanity. DannyZz 00:25, 21 September 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.