Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dark River (Warriors)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Warriors (book series). History will be left intact since there appears to be strong interest in merging, whether, what, and where to merge is an editorial decision. Seraphimblade Talk to me 06:49, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Dark River (Warriors)

Dark River (Warriors) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This is an unreferenced article on a book that doesn't come out until January of 2008. Nothing in the article suggests that the book will be notable. The article is filled with speculative terms and the main content of the article is a action summary from an excerpt of the book from the previous book in the series. This should be deleted until after the book is released in half a year and notability can be proven and sources can be found. Metros 22:12, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Merge to Warriors (book series), which has an empty header with only a link to this book name. Any crystal ballery can be removed from there. - Zeibura(talk) 22:45, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

  • Merge with Outcast We don't have enough info on them, so it makes sense to make a small article on both of them. ~Crowstar~ 15:20, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Merge and Redirect per Zeibura. Can always be recreated in the future.Legalbeaver 17:22, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep I have modified it so that it has a infobox with a fair bit of info. I have also added a reference that should be reliable enough and that has a page on the book, Dark River. (Amazon.com). If anything, the idea of merging Outcast with it is also a good idea.~Bella 17:19, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete for now This will be a notable book, Metros, there is be no question about that. However, the reason this should be deleted is simply because you can't write an article with sources on a book that hasn't been published. The only thing we know about it is the two page preview at the back of The Sight. The information about when it will be published could easily be merged with the main article. When the book comes out would be the appropriate time to rewrite this article. KjtheDj 20:07, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.