Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dark Alliance

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. CDC (talk) 23:42, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Dark Alliance

Normally we delete secret societies because their secrecy makes them unverifiable. In this case there is one twist that might make a difference: the comment that many prominent people have been accused of being members; the accusations would be verifiable. However, there are no examples of accused prominent people in the article currently. Google gets swamped with alternate meanings for "Dark Alliance" when I try to check so I can't prove this is a commonly referenced secret 'society'. If we can't document the accusations of membership in this organization then it should be deleted. RJFJR 02:42, Jun 2, 2005 (UTC)

• Delete, unverifiable, likely hoax. I don't believe even such accusations would be encyclopedic. AиDя01DTALKEMAIL 02:54, Jun 2, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - Nearly every google hit for "Dark alliance" + freemasonry is for websites dealing with a series of articles on crack cocaine done by the San Jose Mercury News entitled 'Dark Alliance' or for websites dealing with conspiracy theories. The only website I could find that in any way dealt with a group of Freemasons called Dark Alliance is this: http://www.media.org.hk/messageboard/asp/ctv001/title1.asp?Page=3 however it is in Cantonese so I dont know what it says. Im almost 100% this is a hoax. -CunningLinguist 03:10, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - Article is too vague ("many high profile individuals") and does not assert notability. michael 03:21, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete unverifiable. --Xcali 05:57, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, unverifiable. --bainer (talk) 08:44, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete yep, unverifiable. --Etacar11 23:50, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete maybe someday if it become famous we can include it. Pufferfish101 04:11, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.