Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DarkZero

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. – Sceptre (Talk) 20:19, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] DarkZero

  ATTENTION!

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on a forum, please note that this is not a majority vote, but rather a discussion to establish a consensus among Wikipedia editors on whether a page is suitable for this encyclopedia. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines to help us decide this, and deletion decisions are made on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

Nonetheless, you are welcome to participate and express your opinions. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments by suspected single-purpose accounts can be tagged using {{subst:spa|username}}

nn site, does not meet WP:WEB; Alexa Rank 500K+. Delete.  RasputinAXP  talk contribs 02:06, 10 January 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete as per nom. Deltabeignet 02:36, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete as per nomination, nn ad-like content for site. *\o/* Dustimagic *\o/* 03:57, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong delete per nom. Werdna648T/C\@ 09:03, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete from mainspace and Userfy it. Should be made a user subpage -- Eddie 11:26, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
    • Comment: Eddie, there's nothing here to userfy; it's not likely to become notable anytime soon.  RasputinAXP  talk contribs 12:17, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
      • I suggested userfying because it might be a personal web page created by Tinodz and while the page clearly doesn't belong in the mainspace, the page creator might want to keep it as a subpage. -- Eddie 12:49, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
        • Wikipedia is not a free host or webspace provider, and they clearly have a website.  RasputinAXP  talk contribs 15:09, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
  • I'm with Rasputing here. If this were about a person I'd userfy it, but this is not one I'd userfy myself. - Just zis  Guy, you know? [T]/[C] AfD? 22:17, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom Mushintalk 19:40, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Don't Delete: Why delete this when Deviantart has a page made for itself? That seems exactly the same to me... OnionHeadHat
  • Don't Delete: Gamefreaks365 has there own page on Wiki and is a site that DarkZero affiliates with. Their site is not up for deletion so it would be unfair if ours was. The only problem with their entry is that it seems to read like an ad for the site. If this DarkZero article offended or read advertlike it will be change the next time I edit it. It is supposed to (will in next edit) read as a small history of Darkzero in the two years it excisted and what will happen in the coming months in future edits.Tinodz
  • Delete per above --Revolución (talk) 01:20, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
  • don't delete per Tinodz
  • Delete as non-notable website. —Quarl (talk) 2006-01-11 02:18Z
  • Delete Vanispamcruftisement. - Just zis  Guy, you know? [T]/[C] AfD? 22:17, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per JzG. Stifle 23:12, 12 January 2006 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.