Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darby's law

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. -- ( drini's page ☎ ) 07:11, 16 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Darby's law

Pointless article about a neologism. —Cleared as filed. 22:18, 10 January 2006 (UTC)

• Strong delete -- ( drini's page ☎ ) 22:19, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as protologism. — TheKMan^talk 23:02, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as unverifiable and non-notable. 9 google hits for "darby's law" which are other people's laws. No hits for "Jenny Darby" "darby's law". —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-01-11 06:16Z
• Delete per Quarl. Stifle 15:03, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
• Comment Reverted AFD blanking by 24.91.65.123 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · block user · block log). I figured out what BB&N is: Buckingham Browne & Nichols, a K-12 school. Vanguard is probably the school newspaper. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-01-12 00:28Z
• Comment: In that case it probably comes under WP:NFT. Stifle 11:18, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.