Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darabukka

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was redirect to goblet drum. —Korath (Talk) 00:56, Apr 5, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Darabukka

Not worthy. Delete --Neigel von Teighen 23:01, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)

  • Keep Uh... how not? Britannica has an article on it - several thousand google results. This is another complete waste of the community's time, an absolutely pathetic nomination. --Oldak Quill 23:10, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
I think it's not worth to keep... But you're free to vote and that's the idea of the VfD. --Neigel von Teighen 23:15, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • Redirect. Let's see... improperly nominated, no reason given for nomination, has an article in a paper encyclopedia. This would be much better served as a redirect to Goblet drum, since it is mentioned there, and the link from dumbek goes there, as well. android↔talk 23:17, Mar 30, 2005 (UTC)
    • Sorry, I didn't see that the VfD notice had been removed. Regardless of how pathetic you believe the nomination is, OldakQuill, please don't remove the notice. (The cleanup, however, is a good thing.) android↔talk 23:21, Mar 30, 2005 (UTC)
      • It was an accidental removal, NvT and I similtaneously edited. I certainly do not wish to impede the VfD process, no matter how silly a nomination I believe this to be. --Oldak Quill 23:30, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • So far the article hasn't told me a single thing to differentiate it from a generic goblet drum, so either keep or redirect there. Meelar (talk) 23:34, Mar 30, 2005 (UTC)
  • Redirect to Goblet drum. Megan1967 03:44, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.