Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danville Public Library

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I think consensus is pretty obvious here. Sr13 21:38, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Danville Public Library

Danville Public Library (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

No assertion of notability, unsourced. Was nominated for A7 speedy but denied. --Finngall ^talk 02:21, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

• Strong delete, no notability asserted. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps)))} 02:32, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete non notable, and unsourceable beyond its mere existence. Orderinchaos 03:20, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Unless a library is in a major city or on a college campus, it shouldn't get an article. Blueboy96 03:33, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Library is not a major library or well known like the Library of Alexandria. --_Hdt83 ^Chat 04:21, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete origional research--Sefringle^Talk 04:50, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as non-notable. Nothing special about this one. - Philippe | Talk 05:27, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete : sounds like an ad, not well written, and not well known. --Onceonthisisland 15:36, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - per all above--Bryson 18:38, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.