Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danny Quilty

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy delete. – Rich Farmbrough. 21:58, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Danny Quilty

Non-notable rocker. Author has removed deletion tags a couple times. Delete. Grandmasterka 10:52, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. Non-notable musician. Capitalistroadster 11:41, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- Capitalistroadster 11:49, 9 February 2006 (UTC)"
• Delete. --Roisterer 11:57, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. PJM 12:21, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - Reason: I am just his brother, trying to do a favour for him to get some info on the net...its not a pisstake. Helview 10:57, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete I added a {{prod}} tag earlier because I found no evidence whatsoever for the claims of massive influence. Unverifiable. Probably a real guy but not notable. --Spondoolicks 13:09, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Danny's brother, Wikipedia is not a soapbox, and musicians should meet certain criteria unless they're a very special case indeed, which your brother appears not to, yet. Best of luck in his continuing career and if he ever does meet the criteria please do put up an article. Tonywalton  | Talk 13:13, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete vanity. Elfguy 14:53, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - nn per above. --lightdarkness ^(talk) 15:45, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:MUSIC. --Kinu 17:27, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete Google searching on "Danny Quilty" and Berowra gives 0 results [1] To me, this implies that either this is a hoax, or that the subject is completely non-notable. So, without further corroberation, it should be {{db-bio}} and tagged as such. Avi 21:07, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.